Medicine communication between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and health professionals: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This scoping review will describe strategies to support communication between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and health professionals about medicines. INTRODUCTION: Poor communication is a well-established risk factor contributing to adverse medicine events. Communication challenges are exacerbated for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples due to their poorer health status, greater use of medicines, a first language that may not be English, cultural bias and systemic racism in health services, and lower health literacy resulting from ongoing colonization. A scoping review will assist in summarizing strategies to support the communication process. INCLUSION CRITERIA: The review will consider studies describing strategies related to medicine communication between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and health professionals. METHODS: The proposed review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The review will include all published and unpublished literature in English since 2000, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods study designs, systematic reviews, text and opinion pieces, and gray literature. Databases to be searched will include CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Informit, Indigenous HealthInfoNet, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and Google Scholar. Two researchers will screen titles and abstracts independently and assess the full text of selected citations against inclusion criteria. Extracted data will be presented in narrative format accompanied by tables that reflect the objective of the review.

Equity and Quality of Global CKD Care - what are we waiting for?

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important but insufficiently recognized public health problem. Unprecedented advances in delaying progression of CKD and reducing kidney failure and death have been made in recent years, with the addition of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and other newer medication to the established standard of care with inhibitors of the renin angiotensin system. Despite knowledge of these effective therapies, their prescription and use remains suboptimal globally, and more specially in low resource settings. Many challenges contribute to this gap between knowledge and translation into clinical care, which is even wider in lower resource settings across the globe. Implementation of guideline-directed care is hampered by lack of disease awareness, late or missed diagnosis, clinical inertia, poor quality care, cost of therapy, systemic biases, and lack of patient empowerment. All of these are exacerbated by the social determinants of health and global inequities. Summary CKD is a highly manageable condition but requires equitable and sustainable access to quality care supported by health policies, health financing, patient and healthcare worker education and affordability of medications and diagnostics. Key Messages The gap between the knowledge and tools to treat CKD and the implementation of optimal quality kidney care should no longer be tolerated. Advocacy, research and action are required to improve equitable access to sustainable quality care for CKD everywhere.

Antimicrobial stewardship in rural and remote primary health care: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is an emerging problem worldwide and poses a significant threat to human health. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes are being implemented in health systems globally, primarily in hospitals, to address the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance. Despite the significance of primary health care services in providing health care to communities, antimicrobial stewardship programmes are not well established in this sector, especially in rural and remote settings. This narrative review aims to identify in rural and remote primary health care settings the (1) correlation of antimicrobial resistance with antibiotic prescribing and volume of antibiotic use, (2) appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing, (3) risk factors associated with inappropriate use/prescribing of antibiotics, and (4) effective antimicrobial stewardship strategies. METHODS: The international literature was searched for English only articles between 2000 and 2020 using specified keywords. Seven electronic databases were searched: Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, Ovid Medline and Ovid Emcare. Publication screening and analysis were conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review tools. RESULTS: Fifty-one eligible articles were identified. Inappropriate and excessive antimicrobial prescribing and use directly led to increases in antimicrobial resistance. Increasing rurality of practice is associated with disproportionally higher rates of inappropriate prescribing compared to those in metropolitan areas. Physician knowledge, attitude and behaviour play important roles in mediating antimicrobial prescribing, with strong intrinsic and extrinsic influences including patient factors. Antimicrobial stewardship strategies in rural and remote primary health care settings focus on health care provider and patient education, clinician support systems, utility of antimicrobial resistance surveillance, and policy changes. Results of these interventions were generally positive with decreased antimicrobial resistance rates and improved appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate prescribing and excessive use of antimicrobials are an important contributor to the increasing resistance towards antimicrobial agents particularly in rural and remote primary health care. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes in the form of education, clinical support, surveillance, and policies have been mostly successful in reducing prescribing rates and inappropriate prescriptions. The narrative review highlighted the need for longer interventions to assess changes in antimicrobial resistance rates. The review also identified a lack of differentiation between rural and remote contexts and Indigenous health was inadequately addressed. Future research should have a greater focus on effective interventional components and patient perspectives.

Evaluating antimicrobial prescribing practice in Australian remote primary healthcare clinics.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing contributes to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Gaps exist in the understanding of antimicrobial prescribing in the remote setting. We aimed to assess adherence to guidelines and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in Central Australia. METHODS: A retrospective study assessing antimicrobial prescriptions in ten Aboriginal clinics (three in remote communities and seven in regional centre) using a validated evaluation tool. Antimicrobials prescribed between 1 January-31 December 2018 were randomly selected for inclusion into the study. The main outcome measures were the rates of guideline adherence and inappropriate prescribing. RESULTS: A total of 180 prescriptions were included (96.1% Aboriginal, 32.2% male). Ninety-nine (55.0%) prescriptions were written by general practitioners (GPs), 57 (31.7%) by nurses and 24 (13.3%) by others. Forty-three (25.7%) assessable prescriptions were deemed inappropriate and 75 (44.4%) did not adhere to guidelines. Prescriptions written by GPs were less likely to adhere to guidelines, particularly GPs located in remote communities. The most common reasons for inappropriate prescribing were incorrect dosage/frequency and antimicrobial not indicated. Skin and soft-tissue infection was the commonest indication, with 29 of 41 (70.7%) prescriptions deemed appropriate. Prescriptions for lower respiratory-tract infection had the lowest rate of appropriateness, with one of seven prescriptions deemed appropriate (14.3%). Antimicrobials with the lowest rate of appropriateness were ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefalexin, at 50%, 56%, and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A quarter of antimicrobial prescriptions written in select remote central Australian Aboriginal primary healthcare clinics were deemed inappropriate. The implementation of a comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship program is recommended.